AUSTIN, Texas – A restrictive voting bill on the verge of Republican Gov. Greg Abbott’s desk failed to pass Sunday night after Democrats walked out of the House chamber before a midnight deadline.
Abbott said he would call a special session to try passing a voting bill again but did not say when.
“We’ve said for so many years that we want more people to participate in our democracy. And it just seems that’s not the case,” Democratic state Rep. Carl Sherman said.
Senate Bill 7, known as the Election Integrity Protection Act, is one of several GOP efforts in statehouses around the country to tighten voting restrictions, particularly in urban counties that tend to vote Democratic, after Republicans echoed former President Donald Trump’s unsubstantiated claims that last year’s presidential election was stolen. No widespread fraud was uncovered.
The Texas Senate, voting along party lines, approved a sweeping Republican elections bill shortly after 6 a.m. Sunday after a lively overnight debate led mostly by Democrats that had begun 7½ hours earlier.
Democrats criticized the bill’s restrictions, particularly a ban on 24-hour voting and drive-thru voting that was popular with nonwhite voters last year in Harris County, for disproportionately affecting people of color.
“I represent a majority African American district, and we benefited from the drive-thru voting that you’re trying to ban now. I feel like you’re coming for my district,” said Sen. Borris Miles, D-Houston, adding that leaders with the FBI, Department of Justice and Texas secretary of state’s office acknowledged that the 2020 election was safe, secure and free of widespread fraud.
Sen. Sarah Eckhardt, D-Austin, said SB 7 was an overreaction.
“We’ve had next to no fraud, and this has been documented at the federal level and the state level. But instead you’re rewriting the Election Code,” she said.
Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola, defended his bill as Saturday became Sunday, and he was still at it as sunrise neared – rejecting claims that the bill targeted nonwhite voters or that it was a solution in search of a problem.
“The provisions apply equally across the state. They are not limited to a particular group or particular area,” he said.
Sen. Royce West, D-Dallas, objected to a provision that would close polls until 1 p.m. on the last Sunday of early voting, saying that’s when “Souls to the Polls” events are popular in Black churches, when members go to morning services, then go vote.
“Those election workers want to go to church, too,” Hughes said, adding that he didn’t know the genesis of the Sunday hours change because it came from the House.
“You don’t find that kind of disingenuous?” West replied. “The greatest number of people who vote on Sundays are African Americans.”
A rush to debate
The Senate and House passed widely different versions of SB 7, leading to a conference committee to work out the differences.
That committee’s final version of the bill was filed and distributed to senators at 3:36 p.m. Saturday. Less than three hours later, Hughes stood in the Senate and proposed waiving the rule that requires a 24-hour delay before the bill could be considered by the Senate.
Democrats, who had been huddling in private to discuss their options only a few minutes earlier, objected to the speed of events.
“I would ask that we take the time that’s necessary to understand the changes, to understand the entirety of this before we are asked to vote on a bill that affects every single voter in Texas,” said Sen. Beverly Powell, D-Burleson.
Hughes replied that he planned to give senators a private briefing at 8 p.m., bringing them up to speed on a bill that grew from 23 pages to 67 pages in conference committee – adding there would be plenty of time to discuss SB 7 in public during what he expected to be a long and vigorous floor debate that would not begin until after 10 p.m. to allow more time to study the legislation.
Sen. Jose Menéndez, D-San Antonio, said the late debate would occur when most Texans would not be watching in person or online.
“How did you decide that 10 p.m. tonight was the right time? Does that seem like the best time to be creating very important policymaking decisions, after 10 p.m.?” he said. “Tomorrow, we have the full day to debate any legislative measures, do we not?”
Hughes noted the looming deadline – all conference committee reports must get a vote by midnight Sunday – and Republicans voted as a bloc to waive the 24-hour delay.
A more expansive bill
The Senate returned to SB 7 shortly after 10:30 p.m. by taking up a resolution to give the conference committee permission to include provisions that had not been part of the bills passed by the House and Senate.
Hughes, who was co-chairman of the conference committee, said many of the sections added to SB 7 were taken from other GOP election bills that had passed the Senate or were considered in committee, and other ideas cropped up during negotiations with his co-chairman, Rep. Briscoe Cain, R-Deer Park.
Sen. Nathan Johnson, D-Dallas, called the resolution an affront to the legislative process.
“This seems more like you’re trying to get in bills that you couldn’t pass, or you thought of some other way to do some things that many of the members of this chamber don’t want you to do,” Johnson said.
After the Republican majority voted to approve Senate Resolution 547, senators began debating SB 7 at 12:30 a.m. Sunday.
SB 7 would have created at least 10 categories of new or enhanced criminal penalties related to elections, including against vote harvesting by those paid to aggregate ballots for a candidate or cause and against election workers who reject proper ballots or count invalid ones.
The bill sought to protect partisan poll watchers, who observe polling places and vote-counting centers on behalf of candidates or political parties, by making it a crime for election officials to reject a designated watcher and by ensuring that watchers are not denied “free movement” as they observe.
Hughes called watchers “the eyes and ears of the public,” but Democrats said they have historically been used to intimidate voters, particularly voters of color.
A pattern of late nights
Partisan disagreements have pushed lawmakers into several late-night and early-morning sessions in the past several weeks as Republicans pressed an aggressively conservative agenda this session.
A rancorous debate over SB 7 pushed the Texas House beyond 3 a.m. on May 7, setting the stage for this weekend’s showdown.
A fight over House Bill 3979 found the Senate voting at 2 a.m. on May 22 over legislation that would limit how public school teachers handle discussions of race and racism in the classroom.
The Senate made wholesale changes on the floor, putting the bill in danger when House Democrats successfully argued that several amendments violated House rules.
Having no time to fix the bill by traditional means, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick allowed Hughes to make a motion to recede, a little-known parliamentary maneuver that stripped the bill of all Senate changes and passed HB 3979 in its original House form on a party-line vote.
Democratic objections that the Texas Constitution did not allow bills to be passed that late in the session were overruled.
The session ends Monday, and lawmakers still haven’t agreed upon priority legislation, including fixing the electrical grid after millions of Texans were plunged into cold and darkness during the deadly winter storms in February.
Contributing: The Associated Press.
Source: USA Today – Breaking News