Songwriters Call for Artists to Stop Taking Unfair Royalties

UPDATED: As the music-publishing market continues to heat up to unprecedented levels, songwriter groups have begun speaking out for more equitable treatment. On the heels of a “Pay Songwriters” petition launched in the U.K. last week calling for greater compensation for songwriters comes a social media post from an anonymous group calling itself “The Pact” calling for artists to stop demanding credit and publishing royalties on songs they did not write — a practice that likely dates back to the earliest days of copyright and has been particularly rife in the music industry.

An Instagram message posted by the Pact late Friday reads:

“How does an artist make money? Live/ touring, TV performances, VIP + meet & greets, merch, brand partnerships/ endorsements/ sponsors, feature fees, private performances, SoundExchange/ PPL [performing rights], points on the master [recording] … and publishing.

“How does a songwriter make money? Publishing.

“And yet, more and more often songwriters are being asked to give up publishing to artists who did not contribute to the composition in any way. It’s time to make some changes. #ThePact.”

It has long been an open secret in the music industry that certain artists and/or their management demand a percentage of publishing and a songwriting credit on songs they did not write (or made minor contributions to) as a condition for the artist releasing the song. Songwriters often go along, on the premise that a smaller percentage of a hit song by a major artist is better than a large percentage of the same song when it isn’t a hit.

This practice dates back at least to Elvis Presley’s early superstar days and has continued to varying degrees ever since. Multiple songwriters and executives acknowledge that it exists, but decline to name names to avoid harming their careers.

“A very famous artist’s rep recently told me that giving them publishing despite their not contributing to writing the song in any way was ‘The tax you pay to be on ______’s album,’” wrote Warner A&R exec and songwriter manager Gabz Landman when reposting the Pact’s message. “That makes me sick. This is stealing, plain and simple. I do not know ANY other industry like this. A songwriter’s sole income is publishing and yet artists reduce the writers’ share for absolutely 0 reason beyond greed. A tax is not an excuse.”

“While we’re at it can we talk about producers taking publishing when they had nothing to do with the writing of the song?,” said another writer. “A&R’s also asking for as high as 10% of the publishing,” chimed in another.

Landman and the writers either declined or did not immediately respond to requests for further comment.

It seems likely that this social media post is the first move from the Pact. Variety will have more on the situation as it continues to develop.

 

 

 

Source: Music – Rolling Stone

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Related Post

NEWSLETTER

Sign up for Breaking News, Newsletter, Blog Posts and Special Deals from 1631 Digital and their media/marketing partners.

Subscribers agree to be contacted from 1631 Digital News and/or their media/marketing partners for breaking news alerts, newsletters and special media marketing offers via email, mail and/or texting communication.